Why Deliveroo wants to bring Dubai diners inside the restaurant

🔓 The full version of this article is for premium subscribers only.

Upgrade with a FREE trial to read it in full

You've "forgotten" to take the chicken out of the freezer to defrost, yet again. The only recourse is to swipe almost unconsciously through your phone, landing on your food-delivery app of choice. Muscle memory is an extraordinary thing, isn't it?

Above the fold sit the big, recognisable chains, the logos burned into your brain by a lifetime of advertising. Below them runs a long tail of names you've never heard of and won't remember, a good share of them virtual labels whose map pin, Googled, opens onto a nondescript service door down the side of an industrial unit.

For all that, it's about the last place you'd think of when the question is a birthday dinner, a first date or a work mixer you're already plotting your exit from, because that choice gets made elsewhere, on an Instagram grid, on a word from a friend or a colleague, on an SEO-bait TimeOut list, almost anywhere but the app you'd happily trust to feed you on a weeknight.

And in Dubai, the very app you'd never open for a night out has just started trying to own that decision too.

🔓 The full version of this article is for premium subscribers only.

Upgrade now with a FREE trial to continue reading

Tony Xu, DoorDash's chief executive, put his finger on the same split on a recent episode of the Cheeky Pint podcast, asked why his company had just spent over a billion dollars on SevenRooms, a restaurant reservations and guest-data platform.

His answer, eventually, came down to his wife. She finds restaurants on Instagram. The decision that matters most in the whole business, the one that picks the restaurant, gets made somewhere his company, for all its dominance of takeaway in the States, holds almost no sway.

Closing that gap, between the platform that owns your everyday food attention when you're ordering in and the choice of where you actually go out to eat, is what DoorDash has spent the past year and several billion dollars trying to do.

On the fourth of June, the attempt made its first bow on our shores. Deliveroo, which DoorDash acquired last year, switched on in-app restaurant reservations in Dubai, powered by SevenRooms, which DoorDash also acquired last year, so that a diner can now open the Deliveroo app, browse live table availability and book a table in the same place they'd otherwise order delivery.

The move is the clearest sign yet that the delivery giants are no longer content to just fight over the order and instead have started extending the customer relationship they already own out of the kitchen and into the dining room, chasing the attention and advertising a diner throws off rather than a cut of the bill.

And they're far from alone, with Careem and Noon circling the same idea from inside delivery, and Eat App and Riyadh's SPICE coming at it from outside.

Before the internet, value accrued to whoever controlled scarce supply and the distribution of it.

Newspapers owned printing presses and delivery trucks, taxi fleets owned medallions, hotels owned rooms, and controlling distribution meant controlling the customer, because the customer hadn't any other way to reach the supply.

The magic of the internet inverted that. Distribution became free and transaction costs fell toward zero, so controlling supply no longer conferred control of the customer. Supply was suddenly abundant and a click away.

What became scarce instead was demand, specifically attention and the customer relationship, which is why the defining companies of the era are the ones that own demand rather than supply.

Google owns the demand for information, Meta for social connection, Amazon for retail, Booking for hotel rooms.

Each owns the customer relationship directly, at almost no marginal cost, and that ownership flips the old power balance. Because the platform owns demand, suppliers have to come to it, and suppliers, stripped of their former control over distribution, are progressively reduced to interchangeable inputs sitting behind it.

The shorthand for this is aggregation theory, the framework Ben Thompson has spent the past decade building at Stratechery, a long-time favourite of ours, and one that's informed a good deal of our analysis here.

Its sharpest expression is that the most valuable of these businesses don't even charge for the transaction. Google and Meta don't bill you to search or to scroll, they own your attention and sell access to it through advertising.

The difference between charging for the transaction and owning the attention is the one that matters.

A food-delivery platform is, structurally, a business of exactly this kind, an owner of restaurant demand. It holds the customer relationship, the app you open when you're hungry, the payment method on file, the order history, the habit.

The restaurants are the supply, and on the platform they're substantially commoditised, because the consumer opens Deliveroo or Talabat first and chooses a restaurant second, the reverse of the pre-internet arrangement in which the consumer chose a restaurant and the restaurant owned the relationship.

The price of that inversion is the commission. A food-delivery platform typically takes 15 to 30% of every order it carries. On a typical plate, where the food is roughly a third of the menu price and the restaurant's own net margin is 3 to 5%, the platform routinely takes home more than the kitchen does. That's simply what owning the customer is worth, and what commoditised supply commands.

None of that's new. The question the Dubai launch answers is what a business like this does once it owns demand for one transaction…